Everyone’s heard the word “omnichannel” at conferences, in pitch decks, and across pharma marketing. But here’s the reality: most strategies miss the mark for healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients, and brands. Too often, it becomes a race to show up everywhere instead of focusing on what really matters—timing, relevance, and impact.
At the recent Fierce Pharma Week conference, we challenged our clients and peers to think differently about pharma omnichannel marketing. Here’s why.
As long as I can remember, my mom Eileen has been extremely active. About two years ago, she started playing pickleball, and developed arthritis in her knees. Not uncommon for her age (76).
Her doctor recommended gel shots, which caused some bruising. Again, not uncommon.
But then the bruising didn’t stop. She went to her PCP, who noticed some abnormal bloodwork. For the next 18 months, she pushed for an explanation, resulting in 10+ doctor visits and a year and half of stress. Finally, a hematologist-oncologist diagnosed her with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL).
At last she had her answer, but was that arduous journey necessary? We’d argue no—and that a modern, more precise approach to omnichannel marketing could have made a difference.
In the numerous sessions at Fierce Pharma Week, three themes kept emerging:
At OptimizeRx, we’ve built an approach that includes these elements and more, delivering effective, privacy-safe omnichannel programs that could make a difference for Eileen and others like her. And yes, it uses AI, but that’s not where we start.
Being on the right channels to reach patients like Eileen starts with understanding her before she reaches a key milestone like brand eligibility, a diagnosis opportunity, or an upcoming care visit. Here's how it works:
Once we have the audience, the next step is to determine the channel mix. It starts with profiling.
Pharma marketers often equate omnichannel with reach: being on as many channels as possible. But HCPs and patients don’t want more; they want better. Physicians are already overwhelmed, and patients are flooded with health content online. Adding noise doesn’t build connection, and trying to be everywhere only drains budget.
That’s why a key step in our process is mapping predictive audience segments to real consumer and media behaviors. Instead of stopping at broad demographics (e.g., women 65–80), we dig into the specifics of each patient cohort.
For example, here’s a few findings from our data on TV and social media consumption from Eileen’s cohort, women with marginal zone lymphoma.
Insights like these help brands spend smarter—deciding whether a direct TV buy is worth it, how much to invest in streaming, or where to focus social spend. They also show related trends, like the link between home improvement shows and Pinterest, that could inform campaign creative.
And while this example focused on patients, it’s worth emphasizing that HCPs are media consumers too—with their own patterns and preferences that should factor into targeting and engagement.
So, what if we had been running a campaign on MZL, and used these insights to target our media placements? Well, it’s likely we would have “caught” Eileen earlier in her journey. When we stop treating omnichannel as “everywhere” and instead focus on refining our audience and channel mix, everything changes. Omnichannel becomes a tool for better care, not more noise—and it drives both health and commercial impact.
Every day matters for patients like Eileen. Let’s work together to give them more of them.